Files
foreman/docs/adr/0012-streaming.md
T
2026-05-23 16:41:20 -04:00

1.9 KiB

ADR-0012: Streaming support

Status: Accepted — 2026-05-23

Context

go-llm's provider interface has a Stream() method, and Ollama's native /api/chat streams token-by-token by default. The synchronous passthrough (ADR-0003) must not break streaming clients. Separately, the async /jobs surface (ADR-0004) reports progress via discrete state webhooks, which is a different granularity than token streaming.

Decision

  • Sync passthrough: support streaming. When a /api/chat request sets stream: true, foreman streams the target's token deltas back to the caller (SSE/chunked, matching Ollama's native streaming). A streamed job still moves through the queue; streaming begins once the job reaches working, so a job waiting behind the drain-by-model queue (ADR-0009) simply starts streaming when its turn comes. go-llm's Stream() works against foreman unchanged.
  • Async /jobs surface: no token streaming in v1. Webhooks carry coarse state transitions (ADR-0005) and the final result/artifacts, not per-token deltas. Token-level streaming over a fire-and-forget webhook job is deliberately deferred — it adds a transport (persistent connection or chunked webhook) whose complexity isn't justified yet.

Consequences

  • Interactive go-llm usage gets real streaming through the transparent surface.
  • Orchestration callers get state + final artifacts, which is what they need; they can use the sync streaming surface directly if they want tokens.
  • The job state machine and webhook protocol stay simple (no streaming transport to design or operate).

Alternatives considered

  • Stream tokens over the async surface too. Deferred: requires either a long-lived connection (defeats the point of async) or chunked-delta webhooks (complex, rarely needed). Revisit only on a concrete need.
  • No streaming at all. Would break go-llm's Stream() and interactive use on the very path that is the primary goal. Rejected.