steve
3f1c016e74
Four findings, all real.
**A deictic closer now needs a compression marker too** (opus,
correctness). The pointsAbove branch of isSummaryCloser required only a
back-reference, so a terminal like "Given the analysis above, I
recommend option B because X" — a pointer followed by a CONCLUSION the
earlier turn never contained — would be discarded in favour of that
turn, throwing away the answer. The ack shape does not have this problem
because "Citations are logged." carries nothing; a bare pointer does not
carry that guarantee.
Both halves are now required: the pointer says the full answer is
elsewhere, and compressionMarkerRe ("Short version:", "TL;DR", "In
short") is the model saying what sits beside it is a condensation rather
than new reasoning. #1611's closer has both. A marker without a pointer
stays out of scope for the reason already documented — a user who asked
for brevity gets exactly that shape. Unmatched closers keep today's
behaviour, so the narrowing fails closed.
**CRLF** (opus, error-handling): "above\r\n" was not clause-final, so a
CRLF transcript quietly lost every line-final deictic. CR joins LF in the
terminator set.
**A comment wrapped mid-phrase** so that "// -style" read as a list
marker (sonnet) — reflowed as part of rewriting that doc block.
**Process provenance in a test comment** (sonnet): "(gadfly, 3 models)"
is an execution log, not an invariant. The lesson survives, the
attribution does not.
Break-check is ten mutations now — dropping CR and dropping the
compression requirement are each killed by their own named cases — with
the control surviving.