Files
gadfly/.gitea/workflows/adversarial-review.yml
T
steve 48af34f4ca
Build & push image / build-and-push (pull_request) Successful in 5s
ci: dogfood the FULL fleet — 9 cloud + 2 Macs, matching mort
The dogfood workflow had a truncated 5-model list (3 cloud + the 2 Macs)
and was missing GADFLY_PROVIDER_LENS_CONCURRENCY. Restore mort's full
fleet so gadfly reviews its own PRs with the same 11 reviewers and the
model-quality scoreboard is comparable across both repos:

  9 cloud: minimax-m3, glm-5.2, glm-5.1, kimi-k2.7-code, deepseek-v4-pro,
           nemotron-3-super, gpt-oss:120b, qwen3-coder:480b, gemma4
  2 local: m1/qwen3:14b, m5/qwen3.6:35b-mlx

GADFLY_MODELS / *_CONCURRENCY / *_LENS_CONCURRENCY now match mort's
adversarial-review.yml verbatim.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-27 14:31:07 -04:00

99 lines
5.3 KiB
YAML

# Gadfly — agentic adversarial PR reviewer (https://gitea.stevedudenhoeffer.com/steve/gadfly).
#
# Runs the published Gadfly image (pinned to an immutable :sha- tag — act_runner
# caches :latest, and this build is what carries foreman provider-type support)
# as a specialist swarm and posts
# ONE consolidated review comment as gitea-actions. Advisory only — never blocks a
# merge. Gadfly reviewing its OWN PRs — dogfooding, full fleet (9 cloud + the M1/M5
# Macs), copied from mort's setup.
name: Adversarial Review (Gadfly)
on:
pull_request:
types: [opened, reopened, ready_for_review]
issue_comment:
types: [created]
workflow_dispatch:
inputs:
pr_number:
description: "PR number to review"
required: true
permissions:
contents: read
issues: write
pull-requests: write
concurrency:
group: gadfly-${{ github.event.issue.number || github.event.pull_request.number || github.event.inputs.pr_number }}
cancel-in-progress: true
jobs:
review:
# Security: only trusted users may trigger a secret-bearing run via a PR
# comment (pull_request + workflow_dispatch are already trusted). Mirrors
# GADFLY_ALLOWED_USERS, the in-container belt-and-suspenders check.
if: >-
github.event_name != 'issue_comment'
|| (github.event.issue.pull_request
&& (github.actor == 'steve'
|| github.actor == 'fizi'
|| github.actor == 'dazed'))
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
# Full fleet (9 cloud + 2 local Macs, all running concurrently) reviewing
# every PR with the 3-lens suite — the slow local lanes dominate wall time.
timeout-minutes: 90
steps:
- uses: docker://gitea.stevedudenhoeffer.com/steve/gadfly:sha-d7f364d
env:
GITEA_API: ${{ github.server_url }}/api/v1/repos/${{ github.repository }}
GITEA_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITEA_TOKEN }}
OLLAMA_CLOUD_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.OLLAMA_CLOUD_API_KEY }}
# Local Macs, reached through their foreman queues (native Ollama on the
# wire). Gadfly's GADFLY_ENDPOINT_* form with the "foreman" provider
# type: GADFLY_ENDPOINT_M1 registers provider "m1", _M5 registers "m5",
# each building a foreman-preset Ollama client at the given URL. Values
# (host + token) live in gitea secrets, each of the form:
# foreman|https://<foreman-host>|<token>
# (converted from the komodo LLM_* DSNs foreman://<token>@<host>).
# REQUIRES a Gadfly image built with foreman provider-type support
# (the GADFLY_ENDPOINT "foreman|..." type); on an older image the m1/m5
# lanes error with "unknown provider foreman". The HTTPS-only LLM_*
# foreman:// DSN is the alternative that needs no image rebuild.
# NOTE: the Mac behind each foreman must still be awake/reachable; if a
# box is offline, that model's comment shows an error and the others
# still post. (Gitea secrets aren't auto-exposed — map each explicitly.)
GADFLY_ENDPOINT_M1: ${{ secrets.GADFLY_ENDPOINT_M1 }}
GADFLY_ENDPOINT_M5: ${{ secrets.GADFLY_ENDPOINT_M5 }}
# Full fleet: 9 cloud (3 at a time) + M1 Pro + M5 Max — one consolidated
# comment each. Matches mort's setup so the model-quality scoreboard is
# comparable across both repos.
GADFLY_MODELS: "minimax-m3:cloud,glm-5.2:cloud,glm-5.1:cloud,kimi-k2.7-code:cloud,deepseek-v4-pro:cloud,nemotron-3-super:cloud,gpt-oss:120b-cloud,qwen3-coder:480b-cloud,gemma4:cloud,m1/qwen3:14b,m5/qwen3.6:35b-mlx"
# cloud runs 3 at once; each Mac one at a time; all three lanes parallel.
GADFLY_PROVIDER_CONCURRENCY: "ollama-cloud=3,m1=1,m5=1"
# 3 cloud models x 3 lenses = 9 concurrent ollama-cloud queries (under the 10 budget).
GADFLY_PROVIDER_LENS_CONCURRENCY: "ollama-cloud=3"
# Default => the 3-lens suite (security, correctness, error-handling).
# Set the repo var GADFLY_SPECIALISTS to override (csv / "all" / "auto").
GADFLY_SPECIALISTS: ${{ vars.GADFLY_SPECIALISTS || 'security,correctness,error-handling' }}
# Per-lens deadline + bounded steps so the slow local models stay sane.
GADFLY_TIMEOUT_SECS: "600"
GADFLY_MAX_STEPS: "14"
# Allow-list for the comment trigger (mirrors the job-level if: guard).
GADFLY_ALLOWED_USERS: "steve,fizi,dazed"
# --- findings telemetry: POST runs + findings to the gadfly-reports store ---
# Advisory & off unless GADFLY_FINDINGS_URL is set; failures only log to
# stderr and never affect the review. GADFLY_REPO / GADFLY_PR are derived
# in-container; the URL + token are user-scope secrets.
GADFLY_FINDINGS_URL: ${{ secrets.GADFLY_FINDINGS_URL }}
GADFLY_FINDINGS_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GADFLY_FINDINGS_TOKEN }}
# --- event context (leave as-is) ---
EVENT_NAME: ${{ github.event_name }}
PR: ${{ github.event.pull_request.number || github.event.issue.number || github.event.inputs.pr_number }}
PR_BRANCH: ${{ github.head_ref }}
IS_DRAFT: ${{ github.event.pull_request.draft }}
COMMENT_BODY: ${{ github.event.comment.body }}
COMMENT_ID: ${{ github.event.comment.id }}
ACTOR: ${{ github.actor }}