Commit Graph
2 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
steveandClaude Opus 5 14f8533e38 fix(ci): scrub the registry credential before running repo code
Build & push image / build-and-push (pull_request) Successful in 4s
Build & push image / test (pull_request) Successful in 9m47s
Both Claude reviewers caught this independently, and they are right. The test
job I added wrote a PUSH-CAPABLE REGISTRY_PASSWORD into a plaintext
~/.gitconfig and then ran `go build`/`go vet`/`go test` — repository code — on
pull_request events. This repo is public, so a fork PR could ship a test whose
only job is to print that file. The image build had already answered this
question correctly: its credentials are BuildKit secrets scoped to the
module-download RUN and are never present while code executes. I bolted on a
job that skipped the boundary its neighbour maintains.

Dependencies are now fetched in their own step which deletes ~/.gitconfig
before anything else runs, and asserts the scrub — against the whole home
directory, not against the file it just removed, because the credential can
also land in ~/.netrc or ~/.config/go/env. Verified the assertion is not
vacuous: planting the secret in ~/.netrc trips it. Later steps run with
GOPROXY=off, so any attempt to reach the network fails loudly rather than
quietly hunting for the credential that is now gone.

Also from round 4: TestEndpointProviderNamesAreAllAccepted pinned only
endpointProvider, while the constant is the error text for BOTH resolution
paths — it now asserts each advertised name resolves either way (break-checked
by dropping the gemini alias from resolveModel alone). preflight.sh documents
that ollama-cloud is checked on OLLAMA_API_KEY but hinted as
OLLAMA_CLOUD_API_KEY because run.sh copies one to the other first, an ordering
dependency that was invisible from the file.

And the comments that narrated this PR's own edit history ("the first version
of this change...") are rewritten as invariants. That history stops being true
the moment this merges, and the repo's doc policy says as much.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
2026-08-12 17:28:08 -04:00
steveandClaude Opus 5 67a73616e1 fix(qwen): gadfly round 3 — stop guarding a duplicate, delete it
Build & push image / build-and-push (pull_request) Successful in 5s
Build & push image / test (pull_request) Canceled after 7m27s
Twelve findings, all real, and the two that matter are about the pre-flight I
added rather than about qwen.

The credential check had a false pass in the OTHER direction from round 2's: on
the GADFLY_BASE_URL override path, resolveModel builds the client with
GADFLY_API_KEY and never reads QWEN_API_KEY/KIMI_API_KEY, so treating the
provider's own key as sufficient there let a doomed run proceed. Having now
been wrong about these rules in both directions, the check no longer tries to
model both paths: it covers the REGISTRY path, whose rules it can state
exactly, and says nothing about the override path — which is hand-configured by
definition, while the registry path is the one you hit by adding a model id to
a var and forgetting the secret.

The logic moves to scripts/preflight.sh, sourced by both run.sh and the test.
The previous answer to "this test duplicates production logic" was a regex
drift-guard, and that guard compared only the provider table — not the decision
logic, which is precisely the half that carried the bug. A duplicate you guard
is still a duplicate; this deletes it, and the test now runs under `set -u`
like production does.

Also: the test that pins the shared provider slice held its own copy of the
list (now ranges the slice); endpointProviderNames had nothing tying it to the
switches it describes, which is how it shipped without "gemini" (a new test
asserts every advertised name resolves); two godoc lists had drifted; and the
"sanity" line that asserted nothing is gone.

And the repo had NO test job — `go test` and the pre-flight table both existed
and neither was ever executed by CI, which reads as coverage while providing
none. Added one (build/vet/gofmt/test/pre-flight), running alongside the image
build rather than gating it, so red is loud without standing between a push and
a rebuild.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
2026-08-12 17:20:44 -04:00