docs: drop stale 'secrets: inherit' mentions (reusable comment + CLAUDE.md)

Self-review on PR #9 flagged two doc-drift spots left over from the
explicit-secret-forwarding switch. Cosmetic.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

.gitea/workflows/review-reusable.yml

@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ jobs:
           COMMENT_BODY: ${{ github.event.comment.body }}
           COMMENT_ID: ${{ github.event.comment.id }}
           ACTOR: ${{ github.actor }}
-          # --- provider auth (via secrets: inherit; empty if consumer unset) -
+          # --- provider auth (forwarded workflow_call secrets; empty if the caller doesn't forward it) -
           OLLAMA_CLOUD_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.OLLAMA_CLOUD_API_KEY }}
           OPENAI_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.OPENAI_API_KEY }}
           ANTHROPIC_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY }}

CLAUDE.md

@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ entrypoint.sh          container brains: trigger gating, PR clone, model loop (t
 Dockerfile             multi-stage; private-module creds via BuildKit secrets never reach the final image
 .gitea/workflows/build-image.yml   push main → :latest; tag v* → :<tag>+:latest; PR → build-only
 .gitea/workflows/review-reusable.yml  reusable (workflow_call) review job; consumers subscribe with
-                       an ~8-line caller + `secrets: inherit` (Phase 4). gadfly's own
+                       an ~8-line caller forwarding only the secrets the reviewer needs (Phase 4). gadfly's own
                        adversarial-review.yml is a thin caller of it (dogfoods the path).
 examples/              copy-paste consumer stub workflows for different providers
 ```