fix: parseVerdict matches leniently + earliest phrase wins

A section that led with '**Blocking issues**' (no 'found') fell through to
unknown, so the consolidated header wrongly read 'No material issues found'
(seen live on gpt-oss). Now matches 'blocking issue'/'minor issue'/'no material
issue' and picks the earliest-appearing phrase (the lead verdict). + tests.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

cmd/gadfly/consolidate.go

@@ -32,16 +32,25 @@ func (v verdict) label() string {
 // The base prompt tells each lens to lead with one of the three phrases.
 func parseVerdict(out string) verdict {
 	l := strings.ToLower(out)
-	switch {
-	case strings.Contains(l, "blocking issues found"):
-		return verdictBlocking
-	case strings.Contains(l, "no material issues"):
-		return verdictClean
-	case strings.Contains(l, "minor issues"):
-		return verdictMinor
-	default:
-		return verdictUnknown
+	// Match the EARLIEST-appearing verdict phrase (the lead verdict), and match
+	// leniently — models write "Blocking issues found", "**Blocking issues**",
+	// "blocking issue", etc. (A strict "blocking issues found" check let a
+	// gpt-oss section that said "**Blocking issues**" fall through to unknown,
+	// so the overall header wrongly read "No material issues found".)
+	best, bestIdx := verdictUnknown, -1
+	for _, c := range []struct {
+		phrase string
+		v      verdict
+	}{
+		{"blocking issue", verdictBlocking},
+		{"minor issue", verdictMinor},
+		{"no material issue", verdictClean},
+	} {
+		if i := strings.Index(l, c.phrase); i >= 0 && (bestIdx == -1 || i < bestIdx) {
+			best, bestIdx = c.v, i
 		}
+	}
+	return best
 }
 
 // specialistResult pairs a specialist with its rendered review and verdict.

cmd/gadfly/specialists_test.go

@@ -114,6 +114,9 @@ func TestParseVerdictAndWorst(t *testing.T) {
 		"VERDICT: No material issues found.":                      verdictClean,
 		"Minor issues\n- nit":                                     verdictMinor,
 		"**Blocking issues found**":                               verdictBlocking,
+		"**Blocking issues**\n- bug":                              verdictBlocking, // no "found" suffix
+		"VERDICT: Blocking issue\n- one":                          verdictBlocking, // singular
+		"No material issues found. There are no blocking issues.": verdictClean,    // earliest phrase wins
 		"something unparseable":                                   verdictUnknown,
 	}
 	for in, want := range cases {