Build image / build-and-push (push) Successful in 17s
- Remove config.AgentConfig.Ready() — dead after the refactor (no non-test
callers), and its doc comment ("route registration and capabilities gate on
this") was now false. EffectiveAgent.Ready() carries the same logic and IS
used, see below.
- agentHolder now uses eff.Ready() and eff.APIKey instead of an inline check and
a redundant apiKey field it held separately. This makes EffectiveAgent.APIKey/
Ready() production-used rather than test-only, drops the duplicated readiness
check, and simplifies newAgentHolder's signature.
- settingsPayload no longer swallows an EffectiveAgent error into a misleading
empty "effective" view (which would read as "nothing configured"). It returns
the error; the handlers surface it as a 500. EffectiveAgent re-reads the row
GetInstanceSettings just returned, so a failure there is a real DB fault.
- Frontend streamChat handles 503 (assistant disabled at runtime) distinctly
from 404 (endpoint absent) — the backend returns 503 AGENT_DISABLED now, which
the old code mislabelled.
- Fixed the api.go comment that still said a disabled request gets a 404 — it's
a 503.
- updateSettings uses the shared parseNullable[bool] instead of a bespoke
parseNullableBool (now removed).
- NewRunner drops its empty-spec guard; agentmodel.Resolve already owns that
check, so one place decides what a valid spec is.
- rebuild-on-resolve-error now documents WHY it keeps the current Runner rather
than tearing down a working assistant on a transient DB blip: the state is
persisted, the next rebuild reconciles, and killing a live assistant on a read
hiccup is worse than a brief stale window.
Not changed: the store's version-conflict fallback returning GetInstanceSettings'
error instead of ErrVersionConflict when that read also fails. That's the exact
pattern every other version-guarded update uses (gardens/objects/plants); making
only this one differ would be the inconsistency. A DB read failing immediately
after the guarded UPDATE on the same local SQLite file is a disk-fault edge case,
and surfacing that error is defensible.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01H3zbym8Doka2d7D48maSgZ