Commit Graph
6 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
steveandClaude Opus 4.8 28af101634 Address third round of Gadfly findings on #76
Build image / build-and-push (push) Successful in 7s
- hexCenters now derives its exact point count BEFORE building anything and
  returns it alongside the points, refusing over the cap without allocating.
  Previously it materialised the whole lattice and fillLoaded checked len()
  afterwards — so the "too large" path paid for the thing it was rejecting.
  This also makes the preallocation exact, which subsumes the earlier
  over-allocation finding I'd declined: staggered rows hold cols-1, so
  rows*cols over-reserved by ~12%.

- Region.empty() names the invariant that clampTo expresses "no overlap" by
  INVERTING the region rather than zeroing it. A bare `MaxX < MinX` at each
  call site was spreading a non-obvious convention across three functions.

The count is now load-bearing (it gates the cap), so the test asserts it
matches what actually gets built.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01H3zbym8Doka2d7D48maSgZ
2026-07-21 13:25:58 -04:00
steveandClaude Opus 4.8 45da4b15e2 Fill: honour the half-spacing edge rule when packing plops (#75)
Build image / build-and-push (push) Successful in 7s
Gadfly review (reusable) / review (pull_request) Successful in 10m7s
Adversarial Review (Gadfly) / review (pull_request) Successful in 10m8s
Filling a bed left the outer row too far from the edge, and staggered rows
worse still. Two defects, both from anchoring the lattice at the region's min
corner:

- Odd rows offset by `radius` started at `MinX + 2·radius`, leaving a bare
  strip a whole plop wide down one side of every other row.
- All the leftover slack piled up on the far edge, where plops hung 13cm
  outside the bed on a 4×8ft garlic bed. Nothing clips them, so they drew
  over the bed outline.

Spacing is a constraint between neighbouring plants competing for the same
soil, light and water. A bed edge is not a competitor, so the outer row owes
it half the spacing — the arithmetic inside every square-foot-gardening chart
(4/square = 6" apart, 3" from the square's edge).

The wrinkle: a plop is a CLUMP, not a plant. defaultPlopRadius is 1.5×spacing,
so keeping the whole circle inside the bed insets the outer row by 1.5
spacings, three times what the rule allows. So centre the lattice and set the
minimum centre-inset to `radius - spacing/2`: the clump may cross the edge by
up to half a spacing, putting its outermost plants exactly the half-spacing
from the edge the rule asks for. Capped there — a clump mostly outside the bed
would be a drawing of plants in the path.

Same bed, same 15 plops, now symmetric with a deliberate 6.5cm overhang inside
the 7.5cm budget instead of an accidental 13cm on one side only. The stagger
falls out of the centring for free: an offset row holds one fewer plop, and
centring that run puts it exactly half a pitch off its neighbours.

TestFillRegionDeterministicPacking expected 4 plops in a 60×60 bed; the fourth
was centred ON the east edge with half of it outside, well past the budget.
It is 3 now — the fix working, not a regression in it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01H3zbym8Doka2d7D48maSgZ
2026-07-21 10:11:08 -04:00
steveandClaude Opus 4.8 c1c873d3f0 Record the two conventions the live v2 bugs produced
Build image / build-and-push (push) Successful in 9s
The history write's context.WithoutCancel reads like a mistake if you don't know
why it's there, and "tidying" it is exactly how the orphan-history bug came back
a second time (#73). Written down so the next person — or the next session —
doesn't remove it on the way past.

Also a short testing section. Two of the three bugs only real use found were
invisible to the tests I had: a route that was never registered (service tests
can't see that) and a fixture that populated a field the real response leaves
empty (a test asserting my mental model rather than the API).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01H3zbym8Doka2d7D48maSgZ
2026-07-21 09:20:00 -04:00
steve 3a3ce16fce Agent runtime: majordomo in-process, Ollama Cloud config, chat endpoint (#56) (#70)
Build image / build-and-push (push) Successful in 6s
Co-authored-by: Steve Dudenhoeffer <[email protected]>
2026-07-21 06:22:10 +00:00
steveandClaude Opus 4.8 653f381c4b Document the agent env vars; make keeping docs true a standing rule
Build image / build-and-push (push) Successful in 6s
README's config table gained OLLAMA_CLOUD_API_KEY and PANSY_AGENT_MODEL, marked
as read once the assistant lands (#56) so the table describes what the binary
does rather than what it will do. Both are already set in Komodo.

Also fixed the Compose example, which still said "# PANSY_OIDC_ISSUER: ... once
auth (#5) lands" — auth landed a long time ago. That is exactly the kind of rot
this commit is trying to prevent, so it seemed worth fixing in the same breath:
the snippet now shows the OIDC vars people actually need to set.

CLAUDE.md now carries the rule explicitly. README updates go in the SAME commit
as the change that needs them — the env var table and the compose snippet are
the two things people copy, so they hurt most when stale. DESIGN.md tracks real
architecture changes. Examples must run. And when you touch a file, check the
comments around your change are still true, because a stale comment is worse
than none: the next reader believes it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01H3zbym8Doka2d7D48maSgZ
2026-07-21 00:55:06 -04:00
steveandClaude Opus 4.8 1716362981 Add CLAUDE.md and a prominent vibe-coded disclosure in the README
Build image / build-and-push (push) Canceled after 11s
pansy is written by an LLM with a human directing. That belongs near the top of
the README, not in a footnote — someone deciding whether to self-host this and
point it at their own data should know before they decide, not after. The
disclosure says what it actually means in practice (less scrutiny than a
hand-written project, read the code, back up the database) rather than a vague
"AI-assisted" hedge.

CLAUDE.md collects the operational details that otherwise get rediscovered every
session: GOWORK=off, the store/service/api seam and why rules go in the middle
layer, the two unit scales, version-guarded writes, ErrNotFound-as-existence-mask,
the branch/Gadfly/merge/deploy loop, and the env var names that aren't guessable.
It also makes the disclosure a standing rule: if the README is ever rewritten,
that section survives the rewrite, and the only acceptable edit is a clearer one.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01H3zbym8Doka2d7D48maSgZ
2026-07-21 00:50:37 -04:00